News

  • NGOs not given the floor during adoptions due to time constraints

    Some civil society organisations were not able to speak on two adoptions of Working Group reports due to time constraints. At the adoption of the reports of Canada and Saudi Arabia, the Human Rights Council was so much behind schedule that NGOs started their statements at 6 pm. The President of the HRC had to deny three NGOs on each adoption from taking the floor because no interpretation was available anymore.

    However, those statements would still be included in the report of the 11th session of the HRC.

  • Germany raises a point of order about the list of speakers

    At the beginning of the Human Rights Council (HRC) session this morning, Germany raised a point of order concerning the enrolment on the list of speakers for both States and NGOs.

    The German delegate criticised how the registration was handled and especially the fact that some NGOs entered the Palais des Nations yesterday morning before 8 am. He declared that the list of speakers for States and NGOs could be manipulated and called on the HRC President to act in a matter of urgency.

  • Long queues for the list of speakers resume

    In continuity with the fourth UPR session of last February, numerous State delegates queued yesterday and this morning in order to register for the list of speakers for the adoption of UPR Working Group reports. This morning, it is said that ten delegates were already queuing at 4 am to be among the ten first that will be allowed to take the floor, despite the Palais des Nations opening only at 6 am. At 7 am already twenty-five States were queuing.

  • Responses by Guatemala to recommendations - Corrigendum

    Guatemala was reviewed on 6 May 2008 during the second session of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review. The delegation did not provide an addendum containing the responses to the recommendations nor any oral comments to recommendations during the adoption of the Report of the Working Group at the Human Rights Council session on 11 June 2008.

    We therefore considered that no response had been given.

Pages