News

  • Increased monitoring and assessment in follow-up to UPR recommendations

    UPR Info recently monitored the adoptions of the Final Working Group Reports for the 26th Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the 34th session of the Human Rights Council (HRC).
    14 States gave their final responses to any recommendations they had left pending since their review in November 2016. These adoptions, which took place on 16 – 17 March 2017, formally closed the second cycle of the UPR.

  • States and CSOs: New documents on OHCHR website

    The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is now publishing CSO's mid-term reports. This is a key development for CSOs as they can assess implementation of recommendations at mid-term. At UPR Info, we have been encouraging states and civil society to provide the international community with such reports since 2011, in particular in our former Follow-up Programme. We firmly believe that without such mid-term assessments, the UPR process remains largely an exercise focused on its Review in Geneva.
  • Ugandan CSOs finalise suggested implementation matrix

    In December 2016, over 100 Ugandan CSOs gathered in a five-day workshop in Kampala to analyse the UPR recommendations that the state had received at its UPR in November. Divided into thematic clusters, the participants began to develop a CSO suggested implementation matrix outlining their expectations on the Government during the implementation process. In the matrix, CSOs proposes goals to be achieved by implementing each of the 2nd cycle UPR recommendations made to Uganda and pair them with proposed Government implementation actions.
  • Matrices for UPR 28 now available for NGO input

    As the third cycle of the UPR begins, and with the aim of improving the effectiveness of written submissions, the OHCHR has developed new guidelines for "other stakeholders" and has devised 'Matrices of recommendations of countries to be reviewed during the 3rd cycle of the UPR'. The purpose of the matrices is to collect precise and specific information on the level of implementation, in the State under review, of both the accepted and noted recommendations from their previous reviews. They will be used by the OHCHR to draft the document on the summary of other stakeholders' information.

Pages